"We need to be better storytellers"
I hear this constantly in our industry. At conferences. In job descriptions. In LinkedIn posts about what separates great researchers from good ones. Etc...
And every time, I get a little uneasy.
Not because storytelling is bad. It's a powerful rhetorical device. But we've turned it into a blanket prescription, as if every research deliverable should read like Dostoevsky or Hans Christian Andersen.
Storytelling seems to be everywhere. Pick up almost any business book from the last few years and you'll see the pattern: a long personal anecdote. A hiking trip. A coffee-shop epiphany. By the time the "lesson" arrives, you've forgotten why you started reading.
๐ง๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐ฒ๐๐ป'๐ ๐ฐ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ณ๐, ๐ฏ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ฏ๐ณ๐๐๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐. ๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฏ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐, ๐ผ๐ฏ๐๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐๐.
The storytelling arc is familiar:
1. Set the scene
2. Build tension
3. Climax
4. Resolution
It's how novels and movies work. And it's how we're often told presentations should work too.
There's an alternative I find far more effective in most business contexts: Barbara Minto'sย Pyramid Principle, developed at McKinsey in the 1970s. The logic is the opposite of storytelling:
1. Start with what you need to decide
2. Then the key arguments.
3. Then the evidence underneath.
Executives don't read your 60-page deck sequentially. They skip to the recommendation. Scan the support. Move on. A narrative arc often works ๐ข๐จ๐ข๐ช๐ฏ๐ด๐ต them, burying the point under layers of setup.
๐ฆ๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฒ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฝ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐น. ๐ฃ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐บ๐ถ๐ฑ๐ ๐ต๐ฒ๐น๐ฝ ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ผ๐ฝ๐น๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐
Stories work when you need to shift perspective. When leaders need to ๐ง๐ฆ๐ฆ๐ญ what a customer feels. But when the question is: Which market should we enter? Should we kill this product? Where do we place the bet?ย Lead with what they need to make the call. Back it up. Get out of the way.
Best business storytelling is decision-first. A sharp customer anecdote that makes a recommendation land harder? That's great storytelling. The problem is that "be a better storyteller" rarely comes with that caveat, but becomes an identity and the narrative starts shaping the insight rather than serving it. We select data that fits the arc. We smooth out the contradictions. We optimize for engagement over accuracy.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ง๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ
Listen to what the people already at that table actually speak: ๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ฃ๐ช๐, ๐ง๐๐จ๐ , ๐ฉ๐ง๐๐๐-๐ค๐๐๐จ, ๐๐๐๐๐จ๐๐ค๐ฃ๐จ.
The skill that earns you that seat is translating research into the language the business already speaks. Stories can be part of that translation. They are not the translation.
๐ช๐ฒ'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ถ๐๐๐. ๐ช๐ฒ'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐ฟ๐.
So if you want to be a storyteller, i would suggest to become a business-teller first...
โ Back to Blog
ResearchStrategyInsightsFebruary 10, 2026
You want to be a Storyteller? Become a Business-teller first
Related Articles
Want to discuss further?
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this topic.
Get in Touch

